“Will this be a precedent for future anarchic behavior? Perhaps. This is a possibility that we cannot ignore. However, this is a possibility which the government can mitigate, if not eliminate.
Kadamay’s frustration sets out from a denial and seeming lengthy inaction over their applications for housing. Have the government acted upon their applications urgently and have the government clearly explained the reasons for the denial of their applications, this could have been avoided.
Kadamay’s occupation also sets from the fact that the houses are vacant. Speedy disposition of housing grants may have avoided this.”
It is a crisis, and this is not an exaggeration. For the homeless, this is even a battle of life and death. Shelter, being one of the basic necessities of humans, is lacking for thousands of families. We are talking of 20,000 men, women, and children seeking for shelter, and the houses in Pandi, Bulacan, were vacant. There and then, they sought refuge in these unoccupied houses.
It is true. These houses are not Kadamay’s. It is likewise true that they have no right to occupy the houses. However, they should stay.
The right to an adequate shelter is a basic human right and is a government responsibility.
Article 25.1 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, to which the Philippine government is a long-time signatory, provides:
“Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and his family, including food…
View original post 1,464 more words